<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8' ?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<title>Social Memory Complex: freedom</title>
<link href="https://www.socialmemorycomplex.net/tags/freedom/feed.xml" rel="self" />
<link href="https://www.socialmemorycomplex.net/tags/freedom/" />
<updated>2026-05-24T21:17:06+00:00</updated>
<id>https://www.socialmemorycomplex.net/tags/freedom/</id>
<entry>
  <title>David Foster Wallace on freedom and consciousness</title>
  <link href="http://socialmemorycomplex.net/2011/08/30/david-foster-wallace-on-freedom-and-consciousness/" />
  <updated>2011-08-30T00:00:00+00:00</updated>
  <id>http://socialmemorycomplex.net/2011/08/30/david-foster-wallace-on-freedom-and-consciousness/</id>
  <author><name>Jeremy Weiland</name></author>
  <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>This quote from David Foster Wallace pretty much sums up my present thinking on the human condition and the possibilities for freedom and autonomy:</p>
<blockquote>
  <p>Everybody worships. The only choice we get is what to worship. And an outstanding reason for choosing some sort of god or spiritual-type thing to worship – be it JC or Allah, be it Yahweh or the Wiccan mother-goddess or the Four Noble Truths or some intangible set of ethical principles – is that pretty much anything else you worship will eat you alive. If you worship money and things – if they are where you tap real meaning in life – then you will never have enough. Never feel you have enough. It’s the truth. Worship your own body and beauty and sexual allure and you will always feel ugly, and when time and age start showing, you will die a million deaths before they finally plant you. On one level, we all know this stuff already - it’s been codified as myths, proverbs, cliches, bromides, epigrams, parables: the skeleton of every great story. The trick is keeping the truth up front in daily consciousness. Worship power - you will feel weak and afraid, and you will need ever more power over others to keep the fear at bay. Worship your intellect, being seen as smart – you will end up feeling stupid, a fraud, always on the verge of being found out.</p>
</blockquote>

<blockquote>
  <p>The insidious thing about these forms of worship is not that they’re evil or sinful; it is that they are unconscious. They are default settings. They’re the kind of worship you just gradually slip into, day after day, getting more and more selective about what you see and how you measure value without ever being fully aware that that’s what you’re doing. And the world will not discourage you from operating on your default settings, because the world of men and money and power hums along quite nicely on the fuel of fear and contempt and frustration and craving and the worship of self. Our own present culture has harnessed these forces in ways that have yielded extraordinary wealth and comfort and personal freedom. The freedom to be lords of our own tiny skull-sized kingdoms, alone at the center of all creation. This kind of freedom has much to recommend it. But there are all different kinds of freedom, and the kind that is most precious you will not hear much talked about in the great outside world of winning and achieving and displaying. The really important kind of freedom involves attention, and awareness, and discipline, and effort, and being able truly to care about other people and to sacrifice for them, over and over, in myriad petty little unsexy ways, every day. That is real freedom. The alternative is unconsciousness, the default setting, the “rat race” – the constant gnawing sense of having had and lost some infinite thing.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>My challenge over the past few years of deconstructing simplistic individualist libertarianism has been to figure out how I’d recognize the kind of consciousness Wallace is talking about.</p>
]]></content>
</entry><entry>
  <title>Robert Shea on Freedom</title>
  <link href="http://socialmemorycomplex.net/leftlibertarian/2011/01/10/robert-shea-on-freedom/" />
  <updated>2011-01-10T00:00:00+00:00</updated>
  <id>http://socialmemorycomplex.net/leftlibertarian/2011/01/10/robert-shea-on-freedom/</id>
  <author><name>Jeremy Weiland</name></author>
  <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Happy new year!</p>

<p>I just discovered the <a href="https://rawillumination.blogspot.com">RAW Illumination</a> blog that carries on and promotes the philosophy, attitude, and perspective of one of my very favorite authors and thinkers, Robert Anton Wilson. There’s a great <a href="https://rawillumination.blogspot.com/2011/01/few-questions-for-douglas-rushkoff.html">interview</a> with Douglas Rushkoff on his book “Program or Be Programmed” which I reviewed <a href="https://socialmemorycomplex.net/leftlibertarian/2010/11/01/a-review-of-program-or-be-programmed/">here</a>. However, <a href="https://rawillumination.blogspot.com/2010/08/robert-sheas-illuminatus-acceptance.html">this</a> transcription of Robert Shea’s speech upon accepting the Hall of Fame award from the Libertarian Futurist Society for the book he co-wrote with Wilson, The Illuminatus! Trilogy, is quite gratifying to me. It provides comfort for the long, hard slog of being intellectually free and curious, not so much as some demonstration of autonomy as a <a href="https://socialmemorycomplex.net/leftlibertarian/2010/08/16/the-unique-one-and-the-universal/">will to self-definition and self-discovery</a>. The final paragraph is powerful:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>We say in the novel that the original Illuminati were dedicated to religious and political freedom and that this secret organization somehow became perverted so that in recent centuries the Illuminati had become a vehicle for a monstrous authoritarianism. Thus the myth of the Illuminati is an archetype for every political movement, from Lenin’s Bolshevism to Reagan’s Republicanism, that has promised people greater freedom while loading them down with more government. People can be fooled in this way because they are not sure what freedom is. Freedom is a word whose meaning has been worn away by overuse, like a coin that has passed through too many hands. We need to be clear about what it means to us when we use it and maybe not use it quite so much, but use other, more precise words instead.</p>
</blockquote>

<blockquote>
  <p>In ILLUMINATUS! we suggest that freedom begins in your right to define yourself and to insist on the validity of your own perceptions and your own thoughts. To change to a new point of view because you find it convincing is, of course, merely an exercise of that freedom. But freedom is lost when you are coerced or frightened into denying your own way of seeing reality and into accepting a point of view you cannot really believe in, be it that of a family, a teacher, a boss, a party, a church, a state. And an amazing thing is that when each of us insists on his or her own vision, it does not divide us. It unites us as no externally imposed unity ever could. It unites us in reverence for that inner light which we can only find by knowing ourselves, never by denying ourselves, that light by which each one of us can truly be said to be illuminated - the true Illuminati.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Read the whole thing. He also mentions that Wilson stopped calling himself an anarchist, but more out of a rejection of loaded labels than a rejection of the ideas. I feel myself pulled that way at times.</p>
]]></content>
</entry>
</feed>
